APHC010021552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 1875/2025 Between: 1. A. TARUN, S/O A.VENKATA RAMANA, AGED. 31 YEARS, OCC. IT PROFESSIONAL, R/O 6-85-1, 1ST CROSS, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MAHILA URBAN POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPS NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. GALI SUSHMA, W/O GALI VEERAIAH, AGED. 28 YEARS, OCC. JUNIOR DOCTOR, R/O 1-1, CHERLOPALEM, KOVUR MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO.1875 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action on the part of Officials of Respondent No.3 in interfering with matrimonial dispute there by calling Petitioner to Police Station, confining him to their custody with a demand to resolve the matrimonial issues with Respondent No.4 herein without following due process of law and act of detaining Petitioner's Pass Port without judicial orders by competent Criminal Court as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the Officials of Respondent No.3 to not to call the Petitioner to Police Station for resolving any matrimonial dispute with Respondent No.4 and further direct the Respondent No.3 to return Petitioner's Pass Port forthwith and to pass…” 2. Sri N.Chandra Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 29.01.2025. Pmk 4 16 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO:1875 of 2025 Date:29.01.2025 Pmk