[2025:RJ-JP:43197] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12613/2025 Smt. Kamla Meena Wife of Late Shri B.L. Meena, Aged About 71 Years, Resident Of A-2, Mother Teresa Nagar, Village Sawai Gator, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus Jaipur Development Authority, Through Secretary, Ram Kishore Vyas Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishwas Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kuri, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 28/10/2025 1. The short controversy in the matter as submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 01.07.2025 (Annexure-3) qua which it is submitted that for non- compliance of deposit of cost as awarded and the litigation pertaining to year 2015, her petition was dismissed without hearing the merits of the case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter is high on merits and the petitioner has also deposited the cost but with a slight delay. It is further submitted that a sympathetic approach be adopted, as merits should not be suppressed on ac- count of procedural delays, moreover, due to fault of the counsel arguing the matter before learned trial Court. [2025:RJ-JP:43197] (2 of 2) [CW-12613/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present petition be disposed of at this stage, in light of the order dated 24.09.2025 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Smt. Nirmala Meena Vs. Jaipur Development Authority (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12049/2025). 4. Mr. Amit Kuri, Adv. appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-Jaipur Development Authority. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioner, this Court deems it fit that to meet the ends of justice, if the petitioner deposits a cost of Rs.10,000/- with the respondent and Rs.5,000/- with Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, the petition will be revived. It is expected from learned Tribunal that the same be considered, within a period of three months. 7. In view of the aforesaid discussions, the present petition stands disposed of. Stay application and any other pending applications also stand disposed. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /50