SANJAY JALANDHAR PATIL AND ORS v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND ORS
WP/2208/2021 · 2025-03-28
Shri Jitendra Shantilal Jain, Shri M S Sonak
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37038 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37038 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 11.44.WP.2208.21.docx Revati IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (11) WRIT PETITION NO. 2208 OF 2021 Sanjay Jalandhar Patil & Ors …Petitioners Versus The District Collector & Ors …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.18420 OF 2022 Umaji Jaland @ Jalindar Patil …Applicant Versus Sanjay Jalandhar Patil & Ors …Respondents IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
WRIT PETITION NO. 2208 OF 2021 Sanjay Jalandhar Patil & Ors …Petitioners Versus The District Collector & Ors …Respondents (44) WRIT PETITION NO. 4163 OF 2025 Shantinath Eknath Shingre Since Dec Thr Legal Heirs & Anr …Petitioners Versus The District Collector Kolhapur & Ors …Respondents ______________________________________________________ Mr N P Deshpande, for the Petitioner in both the petitions.
2 11.44.WP.2208.21.docx Mr N J Patil i/by Mr Akshay Patil, for the applicant in IA 18420 of 2022 Mr N K Rajpurohit, AGP for the state in WP 2208 of 2021. Mr Vilas Tapkir, for the respondent No.3 in WP 2208 of 2021. Ms V R Raje, AGP for the state in WP 4163 of 2025. ______________________________________________________ CORAM M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. DATED: 28 March 2025 PC:-
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the parties submits that the issues raised in these petitions stand covered by the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench delivered on 31 January 2023 in the case of Ashok Bansode Vs State of Maharashtra1. This decision is placed on record.
3. In terms of the above decision, this Court has held that once the petitioner has executed the sale deeds in respect of other properties in favour of the authorities, there is no question of them claiming any ground rent or any further amounts, than those set out in the sale deeds.
4. Therefore, by adopting the reasoning in the said decision, we dispose of these petitions. No order as to cost.
5. The Interim Application No.18420 of 2022 in Writ Petition No.2208 of 2021 does not survive and is disposed of. The dispute, if any between the parties in Interim Application and original petitioner, in any event, cannot be gone into in 1 Writ Petition No.575 of 2022
3 11.44.WP.2208.21.docx these petitions. Such dispute can be adjudicated before the appropriate forum and dismissal of this petition will not come in the way of such adjudication. (Jitendra Jain, J) (M.S. Sonak, J)