Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37037 (AP)

Gannamaneni Sankaraiah, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/38161/2014 · 2025-08-05

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.38161_2014 APHC010612492014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 38161/2014 Between: 1. GANNAMANENI SANKARAIAH,, S/O SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, WORKING AS TEACHER, R/O. H.NO. L0-32-6B/LA COOPERATIVE COLONY, KAVALI, PSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER KAVALI, MUNICIPALITY, KAVALI, POTTI SRIRMULU NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KAVALI, POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT 4. M/S RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGER, LAKE SHORE TOWERS, 6-3-1090/B/1, RAJ BHAVAN ROAD, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD. 5. B KRISHNA REDDY, S/O KOTI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 10-32-6B/A, COOPERATIVE COLOHY, KAVALI, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 HN, J W.P.No.38161_2014 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or 6:17., Gaon more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in allowing the 4th respondent to go ahead with the erection of Cellular Tower on roof top of the building of the 5th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents herein to remove the erected Cellular 'Tawer from the terrace of the building of the 5th respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 47746 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all erection of Cellular towers that is being made by the 4th respondent on roof top of the building of the 5th respondent in the cooperative colony, Kavali, Nellore District and the operation of the said Cellular Tower forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S A RAZAK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 3. B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR NEL MC) 4. J N BHUSHAN 3 HN, J W.P.No.38161_2014 The Court made the following Order: 1. Heard. 2. Both the learned counsels submit that this writ petition is squarely covered by the common order passed by this court in W.P.No.15293 of 2015, dated 04.0.04.2025. 3. In terms of the same, this writ petition is also disposed of and the petitioner is at liberty to re-agitate his grievance before the Principal Secretary to Government IT E & C Department, if so, advised. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. The Registry is directed to append the copy of the order passed in W.P.No.15293 of 2015, dated 04.0.04.2025 to this order. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 06.08.2025 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.38161_2014 192 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Writ Petition No.38161 of 2014 Date: 06.08.2025 NKA