MANOJ RAM ALIAS MANJ RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./7595/2025 · 2025-12-09
Ambuj Nath
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37036 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37036 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. (2025:JHHC:36896) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 7595 of 2025 Manoj Ram @ Manj Ram, aged about 35 years, son of Dharam Ram, resident of village- Pipcho, P.O.- Makatpur, P.S.- Jainagar, District- Koderma
… Petitioner
- Versus - The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Santosh Kumar Shukla, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Diwakar Jha, Advocate
--- 06/09.12.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025, for the offences registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023, pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Koderma. Petitioner and co-accused persons are alleged to have entered into an agreement with the informant for sale of land. Rs.10,00,000/- was paid to the accused persons including the petitioner. Thereafter, the accused persons refused to execute the sale deed. Mr. Randhir Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner received Rs.2,55,000/- and he is ready to return the same. Mr. Diwakar Jha, learned counsel for the informant submitted that the informant agreed to receive Rs.2,55,000/-, which was given to the petitioner. Mr. Randhir Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner hands over the demand draft of Rs.2,55,000/- in the court. It was further submitted that demand draft may be kept on the record and the same should be handed over to the informant when he appears. The demand draft of Rs.2,55,000/- be kept in the office of Registrar General of this Court and the same be handed over to the informant on his being identified by his lawyer. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Koderma, in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 21 of
2025.
(Ambuj Nath, J.) December 9, 2025 Jay/-