HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12499/2025 1. Aditya Suman S/o Late Shri Nitesh Kumar, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Main Road Civil Lines, Ward No. 1, Ataru, District Baran. 2. Smt. Mamta Suman W/o Late Shri Nitesh Kumar, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Main Road Civil Lines, Ward No. 1, Ataru, District Baran. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Department Of Personnel (Ka-2), Rajasthan Government, Secretariat, Jaipur Through Its Secretary. 2. Department Of Secondary Education, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur Through Its Secretary. 3. Director, Directorate Of Secondary Education, Bikaner. 4. District Education Officer (Secondary), Baran. 5. Chief Block Education Officer, Samagra Shiksha, Kishanganj, District Baran. 6. Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Rampuria Todia, Tehsil Kishanganj, District Baran. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.S. Chauhan for Mr. Arvind Gupta Mr. Sohan Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 16/09/2025 1. Though various prayers have been made in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if; petitioner No.2 is permitted to file a representation before respondent No.6, (2 of 2) [CW-12499/2025] encapsulating the grievances raised in the present writ petition and if a direction is issued to respondent No.6 to decide the same in a time-bound manner. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner No. 2 to file a representation before respondent No.6 within a period of four (04) weeks from today. Respondent No.6 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by passing a speaking order in terms of Annexure-18, strictly in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner. 5. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 6. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J ANAND TANWAR/36