MAHENDER SINGH v. ANISH YADAV, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HISAR AND OTHERS
COCP/1597/2025 · 2025-05-27
Vikram Aggarwal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37029 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37029 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH (203)
COCP No.1597 of 2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 27.05.2025 Mahender Singh
…Petitioner
Versus
Anish Yadav, Deputy Commissioner, Hisar and others
…Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Present: Mr. Shokeen Singh Verma, Advocate Ms. Prabhnoor Kaur, Advocate & Mr. Rahul, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Nischal Chetanya Manchanda, Advocate for Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
**** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)
1.
Short reply on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 has been filed today in the Court. The same is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. As per the reply, in compliance of the directions issued by a Co-ordinate Bench on 29.08.2024 (Annexure P-1), a speaking order 22.05.2025 has been passed. Reasons for delay have also been given in the affidavit.
2.
Since the order stands complied with, no further orders are required to be passed.
3.
The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
JUDGE May 27, 2025
Rekha
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No REKHA SHARMA 2025.05.29 00:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh