VINIT TIWARI AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/11082/2025 · 2025-04-06
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37022 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37022 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:49647 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 11082 of 2025 Applicant :- Vinit Tiwari And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Keshari Nandan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Sri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, Advocate filed vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2 which is taken on record. Office is directed to show the name of Sri Rajesh Kumar Yadav in the appropriate column of counsel in the next cause list. Sri Rajeev Chaudhary, Advocate holding brief of Sri Keshari Nandan Sing, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Raj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri Tej Bhan Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application u/s 528 of B.N.S.S. has been filed with prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 23390 of 2022, arising out of Case Crime No. 257 of 2022, under Sections 147, 323, 325, 336, 427, 452, 504, 506 of I.P.C., P.S. Alinagar, District Chandauli, as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 13.12.2022, pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge (Court No. 1), Chandauli. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press the present application. In view of above, the present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed. Order Date :- 7.4.2025 A.P. Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad