Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Fourth Bail Application No. 752/2025 Balram S/o Banshilal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Shyamoli At Present Gojyari, Police Station Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present In Special Central Jail Dausa) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girraj P. Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 13/05/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this fourth bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0389/2020 registered at Police Station-Malarna Dungar, District-Sawai Madhopur for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 336, 447, 307 and 302 of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel fairly admits that except the custody period of the petitioner, no material change exists in circumstances. He submits that the trial of the case may take considerable time. Therefore, only on the ground of the custody period, bail may be granted to the petitioner.
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-752/2025]
4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application and stated that in light of the cogent evidence and absence of any material change in circumstances, the present bail application of the petitioner ought to be rejected. They further submit that earlier three bail applications have been adjudicated on the basis of the material evidence then available, which remains consistent to date and as there has been no alteration in the prevailing circumstances, the present bail application is liable to be dismissed.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am not inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is dismissed.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Sunita/15