Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37019 (RAJ)

SUNIL KUMAR SON OF VAKEEL SINGH @ VAKEELA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14538/2025 · 2025-11-10

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44942] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14538/2025 Sunil Kumar Son Of Vakeel Singh @ Vakeela, Resident Of Bhairo Ka Pura (Mauroli) Police Station Kotwali, Dholpur District Dholpur (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur) ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-Applicant For Applicant(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain with Ms. Tanisha Jain For Non-Applicant(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 10/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 342/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Dholpur, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 112(2), 281, 132, 109(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and Section 29, 51 of Wild Protection Act, 1972 and Section 41, 42 of Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953 and Section 3(1), 25(1B), 5(1) (A), 25(1)(a) of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that applicant is sole bread earner of the family, having no criminal antecedent registered against him and behind bars ever- since 27.10.2025. It is submitted that allegations are for using fire arm upon public offices/ police authorities, who has stopped them [2025:RJ-JP:44942] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14538/2025] while carrying out smuggling and removal of Bjari/ sand. It is submitted that on account of vindictiveness, the authorities have registered the FIR in a vague and on basis of presumptions and assumptions. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the facts that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family, having no criminal antecedents registered against him; that the applicant is behind bars ever-since 27.10.2025 and considering that there is no recovery of any cartage is made from the applicant, but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Sunil Kumar Son Of Vakeel Singh @ Vakeela shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/232