IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Wednesday, the seventh day of May, Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms.Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition transferred from Tribunal No.847/2022 O.A.No.805 of 2019 Between: K.Santiram ...Petitioner And The State of AP and others ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: 1. D.L.Pandu Counsel for the respondents: 1. GP for Services-I The Court made the following Order: The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to direct the respondents while considering representation dated 06.05.2019 for downgrandation from driver category (class-III) to attender category (Class-IV) in respect of Sri K.Santhi ram, Driver, 8 (A) Naval Unit NCC, Vijayawada and also accommodate applicant son as on medical invalidation compassionate appointment and to pass…” 02. The learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the relief became infructuous as per the instructions of his client. 2 W.P.AT No.847 of 2022 03. Sri V.Ram Manohar, Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I is present. 04. Accordingly, recording the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI Date: 07.05.2025 GRL 3 W.P.AT No.847 of 2022 33 HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI Writ Petition Transfered from APAT No: 847 of 2022 Date: 07.05.2025 GRL 4 W.P.AT No.847 of 2022 This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “…to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents No. 3 to 5 in not considering the roaster points and reservation to the notification vide R.C.No.556/2024/U.Th dt 18.12.2024 in their respective villages is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principal of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and pass such other order or orders…..” 2. Sri Metta Chandra Sekhar Rao, the learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the relief has become infructuous. 3. In view of the representation, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ ___ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated 06.01.2025 GRL 5 W.P.AT No.847 of 2022 176 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 30818 of 2024 6 W.P.AT No.847 of 2022 Date: 06.01.2025 GRL