Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3701 (UTT)

NAVEEN PRASAD NAUTIYAL v. UNION OF INDIA

WPSB/96/2019 · 2025-03-20

Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1963-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB No. 96 of 2019 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. 1. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. None present for the respondents. 3. This writ petition was filed in 2019, seeking a direction to the Authorities to consider petitioner’s claim for regularisation on the post of Assistant Engineer (Electrical). 4. According to petitioner, he was serving as Assistant Engineer on contract basis w.e.f. 20.09.2014, therefore, he was entitled for regularisation of his services. However, no Rules have been brought on record to indicate that there was any vested right to claim regularisation under any Statutory provision. 5. Even otherwise also, petitioner is no more in service in AIIMS, Rishikesh, and reportedly, he is out of employment for the last more than four years. Thus, the relief, as claimed, cannot be granted at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (Ashish Naithani, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 20.03.2025 Aswal