IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.4688 of 2006 With I.A. No.10535 of 2025 ----- Samra Manjhi & Ors. .......... Petitioners. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .......... Respondents. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. P.K. Rai, AC to SC (L&C)-III For the Private Res.: Mr. Durga Charan Mishra, Advocate ----- Order No.22 Date: 01.12.2025 1. Reference may be made to the order dated 24th July, 2025, the relevant paragraphs of which read as under: “Perusal of the record reveals that the notice issued to the respondent No.7(i) & respondent No.13 has returned with the report that they have died and notice has also not been issued to the respondent No.5- The Sixteen (16) Annas Raiyats. Issue notice to respondent No.5- The Sixteen (16) Annas Raiyats of Upar Rangni locality in the district of Dumka by proclamation of the general notice by beat of drums. The petitioner is directed to file costs of proclamation of the general notice by beats of drums upon the respondent No.5- The Sixteen (16) Annas Raiyats of Upar Rangni locality in the district of Dumka along with requisites therefor, within two weeks from the date of this order; failing which, this W.P.(C) shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench. Rule is made returnable within six weeks. In case requisites are filed, list this W.P.(C) after receipt of the service report of the notice issued to the respondent No.5- The Sixteen (16) Annas Raiyats of Upar Rangni locality in the district of Dumka.” 2. An application being I.A. No.10535 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of the petitioners on 6th August, 2025 (i.e. prior to end of peremptory time of two weeks) seeking four weeks more time to file requisites in terms with the order dated 24th July, 2025. 3. Since the time of four weeks as prayed by the petitioners in the present interlocutory application has also come to an end on 5th September, 2025 and the requisites in terms with the aforesaid order has not yet been filed as well as according to the learned senior counsel for the petitioners despite his best efforts, he could not establish any contact with them, the present interlocutory application deserves to be dismissed. 4. Accordingly, I.A. No.10535 of 2025 stands dismissed. 5. Since the petitioners have not filed the requisites in terms with the order dated 24th July, 2025 and further period of four weeks’ time prayed on their behalf has also lapsed, the present writ petition is deemed to have been dismissed for non-compliance of the said order. 6. Office to proceed accordingly. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 1st December,2025 Rohit/