IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 214 RSA-628-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.02.2025 RANBIR SINGH …..Appellant Vs. CHARANJIT KAUR …..Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: None for the appellant. ****** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Aer its admission on 26.04.2000, the appeal was lastly listed before this Court for acutal hearing on 16.05.2005. The appeal had been filed through Sh. H.D. Bansal, Advocate. No,ce sent to Sh. H.D. Bansal, Advocate is received back with the report that party has already taken brief from him. No,ce sent to the sole appellant is received back unserved with the report that no such person resides at the given address. No other address of the appellant except as men,oned in the memo of par,es is available on record. Perusal of the file further reveals that suit for possession filed by the plain,ff was decreed by the trial Court on 15.09.1998, but the appeal of the defendant was accepted and consequently the suit was dismissed on 26.10.1999. Since, this Court is unable to serve the no,ce to the appellant due to un-availability of any other address; and the brief has already been taken from the counsel previously engaged by the appellant, and no other counsel has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant, this Court is le with no op,on but to dismiss the present appeal in default for want of prosecu,on. It is ordered accordingly. However, appellant will be at liberty to get the appeal revived, in case any cause of ac,on survives. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) 06.02.2025 JUDGE pry Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No PRIYANKA 2025.02.07 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document