Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3699 (KAR)

SRI. SADANAND S/O SIDDAMALLAPPA HANCHINAMANI v. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER/DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY

WP/100915/2025 · 2025-02-19

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3360 WP No. 100915 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.100915 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SADANAND S/O. SIDDAMALLAPPA HANCHINAMANI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER CUM CONDUCTOR, NWKRTC, HIREKERUR DEPOT, HAVERI DIVISION – 511 111. 2. SRI GUDDAPPA S/O. TIRAKAPPA MADIWAL, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER, NWKRTC, HIREKERUR DEPOT, HAVERI DIVISION – 581 111. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI RAVI HEGDE AND SRI VINAYKUMAR BHAT, ADVOCATES) AND: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER/ DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, NWKRTC, HAVERI DIVISION, HAVERI – 581 110. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRASHANT S. HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE SUSPENSION ORDERS DATED. 01-01-2025, NUMBER. VA.KA. RA.SAA. HAA.VI. SAM.A. PA. 39/ 24-25/752/24-25 AND 753 (RESPECTIVELY0 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND D, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT, AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3360 WP No. 100915 of 2025 THE RESPONDENT TO REINSTATE THE PETITIONERS BACK INTO SERVICE WITH ALL BENEFITS, BY FIXING OUTER LIMIT AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) The petitioner calls in question the act of the employer placing him under suspension and a direction to reinstate him back into the same place. 2. Heard the learned counsel Sri.Ravi Hegde along with the learned counsel Sri.Vinaykumar Bhat appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel Sri.Prashant Hosmani appearing for the respondent-Corporation. 3. The challenge in the case at hand is to the order of suspension on 01.01.2025. During subsistence of the petition, it transpires that the Corporation has revoked the order of suspension on 24.02.2025 and the petitioner has joined back to the place which he was directed to report. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3360 WP No. 100915 of 2025 4. Therefore, the petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KGK/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0