- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6200 CRL.A No. 133 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2025 BETWEEN: B.S. MURUGESH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, W/O SAMPANGI RAMEGOWDA, R/AT 1ST BLOCK, NEAR NEW POLICE STATION, BETHAMANGALA TALUK, 563 116 KOLAR DISTRICT, ALSO RESIDING AT - BALUVANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASAMBALLI HOBLI, K.G.F TALUK- 563116 KOLAR DISTRICT. (APPELLANT IS ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NO.1) …APPELLANT (BY SMT. JAYALAKSHMI P.N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. UDHAYA KUMAR G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPTD. BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KASAMBALLI POLICE STATION, K.G.F. TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6200 CRL.A No. 133 of 2025 HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE.560001. 2. SWATHI W/O NAVEEN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, BALUVANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASAMBALLI HOBLI, K.G.F TALUK- 563116 KOLAR DISTRICT. 3. NAVEEN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O NARAYANAPPA, BALUVANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASAMBALLI HOBLI, K.G.F TALUK- 563116, KOLAR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI CHANNAPPA ERAPPA, HCGP FOR R1 / STATE) THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 14A(2) OF SC AND ST (POA) ACT BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE II ADDL. DIST. AND SESSION JUDGE AT KOLAR IN CRIMINAL MISC.972/2024 DATED 13.12.2024 REJECTING THE PETITION SEEKING ANTICIPATORY BAIL AND ENLARGE THE APPELLANT ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.65/2024 AT KYASAMBALLI POLICE STATION REP. BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, K.G.F. FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 352, 74, 324(4) OF BNS AND SEC. 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) OF SC AND ST (POA) ACT 1989. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6200 CRL.A No. 133 of 2025 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. Memo reads as under: "This appeal may be dismissed as the same has become infructuous". In view of the memo filed, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn as it has rendered infructuous. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31