2025:HHC:37262 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. : 267 of 2023 Decided on : 06.11.2025 Kusum Kumari …Petitioner Versus Dharampal …Respondent The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Petitioner in person with Mr. B.L. Soni, Advocate. For the respondent : Respondent in person with Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate. Virender Singh, Judge (oral) Petitioner – Kusum Kumari has filed the present Criminal Revision against the judgment dated 06.05.2023, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Appellate Court’), in Criminal Appeal No. 48 of 2022, titled as ‘Smt. Kusum Kumari Vs Dharampal’. 2. By way of judgment dated 06.05.2023, the learned Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner against the judgment of conviction, dated 06.08.2022 and order of sentence dated 03.09.2022, 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 2025:HHC:37262 passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Manali, District Kullu, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as the ‘trial Court’), in Complaint Regn. No. 255/2017, titled as ‘Dharampal Vs Smt. Kusum Kumari’. 3. Vide judgment of conviction, dated 06.08.2022 and order of sentence dated 03.09.2022, learned trial Court has convicted the petitioner, for the offence, punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NI Act’) and sentenced her to undergo simple imprisonment, for a period of six months and to pay a fine/compensation of Rs. 2,10,000/- to the complainant. 4. After dismissal of the appeal by the learned Appellate Court, the present Criminal Revision has been preferred. 5. During the pendency of the present petition, the parties have settled the matter. Thereafter, the petitioner has filed application bearing Cr.MP No. 4853 of 2025, for permitting the parties to compound the offence, on the ground that the matter has been settled between them. 6. Statements of the petitioner, as well as, respondent, have been recorded, in which, they both have 3 2025:HHC:37262 deposed that the dispute with regard to Cheque No. 808506, dated 18.09.2017, has been settled between the parties. 7. Today, the accused (petitioner) is present before this Court. She has deposed that she has been convicted and sentenced by the learned trial Court vide judgment of conviction, dated 06.08.2022 and order of sentence dated 03.09.2022. 8. Against the said judgment of conviction and order of sentence, the petitioner had filed the appeal before the learned Appellate Court and the learned Appellate Court has dismissed her appeal. Now, she is before this Court, by way of the present Criminal Revision. 9. In addition to this, the accused (petitioner) has also submitted that during the pendency of the Criminal Revision, the matter has been compromised between her and the complainant. 10. The petitioner-accused has also deposed that on the basis of the said compromise, the present petition may kindly be allowed by setting aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, referred to above, and she may kindly be acquitted of the charge. 4 2025:HHC:37262 11. Respondent has also made the similar statement. He has deposed that he has no objection, in case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner- accused is acquitted by setting aside the judgment of conviction, dated 06.08.2022 and order of sentence, dated 03.09.2022. 12. On the basis of the above statements, one thing is clear that the matter has been settled between the parties and in pursuance of the said settlement, complainant has received the remaining amount of compensation from the petitioner. 13. According to the respondent-complainant, the dispute with regard to Cheque No. 808506 dated 18.09.2017, has been settled between the parties. 14. Since, the matter, with regard to cheque, in question, has been settled between the parties, as such, the application, bearing Cr.MP No. 4853 of 2025, is allowed and the parties are permitted to compound the offence. 15. Considering the fact that the application for compounding of the offence has been allowed, the present petition is allowed and the judgment of conviction, dated 06.08.2022 and order of sentence dated 03.09.2022, 5 2025:HHC:37262 passed by learned trial Court in Complaint Regn. No. 255/2017, which has been affirmed by learned Appellate Court, in Criminal Appeal No. 48 of 2022, vide judgment dated 06.05.2023, are set aside and the petitioner is acquitted from the offence, punishable under Section 138 NI Act. Her personal and surety bonds are discharged. 16. However, this order shall be subject to deposit of 7.5% of the cheque amount, as compounding fee, within seven days from today. 50% of the compounding fee be deposited with the Member Secretary, H.P. State Legal Services Authority, Shimla, and remaining 50% with the Chief Justice Disaster Relief Fund. 17. It is further clarified that if the petitioner fails to deposit the compounding fee, as ordered by this Court, within eight weeks, then, the present petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed, by reviving the judgment of conviction, dated 06.08.2022 and order of sentence dated 03.09.2022, passed by learned trial Court and in that eventuality, she shall surrender before the learned trial Court to undergo the substantive sentence, imposed upon her, by the learned trial Court. 6 2025:HHC:37262 18. The amount, so deposited by the petitioner- accused, in the learned trial Court, be refunded to her. 19. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Virender Singh) Judge 06th November, 2025 (Pramod Kumar)