Sanjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar through Mr. Nitin Kumar Singh Director Agriculture Department
MJC/1808/2025 · 2026-04-03
Anshuman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3698 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3698 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1808 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12271 of 2024 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Son of Shri Vakil Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Jhurkhuriya, Post-Bahadurpur (Sabaur), P.S.-Zero Mile, District-Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Mr. Nitin Kumar Singh Director Agriculture Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. Mr. Pankaj Kumar , The Secretary, Agriculture Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. Mr. Anuj Kumar, The Deputy Secretary, Agriculture Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4. Mr. Manoj Kumar, The Under Secretary, Agriculture Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
5. Mr. Nawal Kishor Choudhary, The Collector, Bhagalpur.
6. Mr. Anil Kumar, The Joint Director (Agronomy) Form Agriculture Department, Bhagalpur.
7. Mr. Anshul Kumar, The Collector, Banka.
8. Mr. Prakash Chandra Mishra, The District Agriculture (Agronomy) Form, Purnia.
9. Mr. Dr. Sandip Roy, The Accountant General x
10. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, The Senior Account Officer, Accountant General Office, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Government Advocate 9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 4 03-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 20.08.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No.12271 of 2024 has not been complied in its true spirit.
Patna High Court MJC No.1808 of 2025(4) dt.03-04-2026 2/2
3. Counsel for the O.P. submits that the order has been fully complied.
4. As such, the contempt proceeding is dropped and the present MJC application is hereby dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner that if he has still any grievance then, he may challenge the said order before the concerned authority in accordance with law.
Prakashmani/- (Dr. Anshuman, J) U