[2025:RJ-JP:47266] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14665/2025 1. Ganesh Kumhar Son Of Jagdish, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Dyoda, Choudhary, Post Nayla, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Dheerendra Singh Rathore Son Of Shree Rajendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of 20, Sindhi Colony, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur-302004 (Raj.) 3. Subhash Kumar Saini Son Of Suresh Kumar Saini, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Bagwali Dhani, Rundal, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Roshan Sharma Son Of Nathu Lal Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Narharipura, Chandlai, Tehsil Chaksu (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Secretariat, Jaipur - 302205 (Raj.) 2. Additional Principal And Controller And Convener Screening Committee, Sms Medical College, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Medical Superintendent, Super Specialty Hospital, Sms Hospital, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Medical Officer Incharge (Mndy), Super Specialty Hospital, Jaipur (Raj.) 5. M/s Gupta Contractors, H.no. 3/35, Kala Kuan, Aravali Vihar, Alwar (Raj.) Through Its Proprietor. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16754/2025 Absar Ahmed Son Of Abdul Jabbar, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Chand Colony, Dashera Maidan, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary Department Of Medical And Health Services, [2025:RJ-JP:47266] (2 of 3) [CW-14665/2025] Government Secretariat, Jaipur- 302205 (Raj.). 2. Director Non Gazetted (Public And Health), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan Jaipur Having Its Office At Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C Scheme, Jaipur- 302005 (Raj.). 3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Karauli (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Iliyas Khan Mr. Salim Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/11/2025 1. These writ petitions filed with common question of law, hence, they are tagged together and disposed at this stage. 2. For ready reference, we are reproducing prayer of lead matter “Ganesh Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.” and same is reproduced as under: “It is therefore humbly prayed present writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and the action of the respondents in discontinuing the services of the petitioners from the post of Pharmacist w.e.f. 31.08.2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents may kindly be directed to allow the petitioners to work on the post of Pharmacist on contract basis till the regularly selected candidates are made available. That the action of the respondents in replacing the services of the petitioners by another set of contractual employee may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents may kindly be directed to allow the petitioners to work on the post of Pharmacist till the regularly selected candidates are made available. That the order dated 03.09.2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside. [2025:RJ-JP:47266] (3 of 3) [CW-14665/2025] And the respondents may kindly be directed to pay outstanding salary of the petitioners from June 2025 till 31.08.2025. Any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioner..” 3. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 03.04.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6499/2025 titled as “Souraj & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.” submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, and writ petitions be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, these writ petitions are disposed of in light of Souraj & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra) and respondents are directed to consider engagement of petitioners, in case they feel that the services of petitioner(s) are required by them. The petitioners may file representation to government respondents (Not private party) for consideration of their engagement. 5. The writ petitions with pending application(s), if any stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /66,81