Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36978 (KAR)

SRI. V R VIJAY KUMAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/36440/2024 · 2025-03-07

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10035 WP No. 36440 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 36440 OF 2024 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. V R VIJAY KUMAR SON OF LATE R.V RAO, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.268, BAIROJI RAO LAYOUT, PIPE LANE ROAD, SRINAGAR, BANGALORE 5600058. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUDHINDRA B S.,ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, MS BUILDING, BANGALORE 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. YOGESH D.NAIK., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION BY CONSIDERING ANNX-A REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DTD. 29.08.2024 GIVEN TO RESPONDENT AND ISSUE A MANDAMUS TO THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE SAME AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10035 WP No. 36440 of 2024 ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; i. Allow the Writ petition by considering Annexure-A representation of the petitioner dated 29.08.2024 given to respondent and issue a Mandamus to the Respondent to consider the same. ii. Pass an order supersede the Vishwabharathi House Building Co-operative Society and direct the Respondent to withdraw all the pending proceedings initiated by the administrator, illegally appointed secretory in all courts and also take criminal action against all the said persons who all are involved from 2017 till this date. 2. A memo dated 6.3.2025 has been filed and signed by the petitioner and learned counsel for the petitioner, which reads as under; Memo The petitioner in the above mater submits that, in view of changed circumstances subsequent to filing of above petition, he is not pressing the matter, accordingly same may be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity. 3. Accepting the said memo and submission of the Learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4