[2025:RJ-JP:40567] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12000/2025 Anuj Mulawat S/o Vinit Mulawat, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Plot No. 12, Jain Marg, Nagouri Mohalla, Bhilwara, Presently Tower 01, Flat No. 704, Rangoli Greens, Maharana Pratap Marg, Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur. (Accused Presently Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Mishra For State(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Ms. Arti Sharma, PP For Complainant : Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 07/10/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 197/2025 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan, for the offence(s) under Sections 318(2), 316(2) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that the accused-applicant is behind bars ever since 29.08.2025. It is further submitted that the accused-applicant was working as a Relationship Banker. It is further submitted that the transaction in question is a monetary transaction, thus matter is civil in nature. It is further submitted that complainant deposited certain amount as an investment, wherein, loss has occurred. It is further [2025:RJ-JP:40567] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12000/2025] submitted that instant matter is purely civil in nature which is given a criminal colour. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application and have submitted that the complainant is an old man aged approximately 80 years who is duped by the Relationship Manager i.e. the accused-applicant. It is further submitted that the accused-applicant created forged/bogus policy and investment bonds and kept the complainant in dark. It is further submitted that instant matter has no civil flavor as there is fraud and mens rea attached to the same. 4. Heard. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that bogus and forged policy was created by the accused-applicant, therefore, this Court considering the material available on record but without commenting anything on merits/demerits, is not inclined to allow the instant bail application of the accused-applicant. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail applicant is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/113