[2025:RJ-JP:50027] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.7702/2025 1. Ramkumar Son Of Govindram, Resident Of Village Palthana, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar. 2. Shreeram Choudhary Son Of Shri Lalaram, Resident Of Village Kheri Dhukiyan, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar. 3. Hari Signh Fhagodiya Son Of Girdhari Singh, Resident Of Vpo Pacharon Ki Dhani, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar. 4. Saroj Devi Wife Of Dhamendra Singh, Resident Of Vop Sanwalwooda, Purohitan, District Sikar. 5. Vijay Kumar Son Of Ramkumar, Resident Of Village Palthana, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar. 6. Vinod Kumar Son Of Ramkumar, Resident Of Village Palthana, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar. 7. Deepesh Arye Son Of Vijay Kumar, Resident Of Village Palthana, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar. 8. Lipi Arye Son Of Vijay Kumar, Resident Of Village Palthana, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Mahesh Kumar Son Of Hardevaram, Residnet Of Rulyani Panchayat Samiti, Nechwa Police Station Nechwa, Distt. Sikar At Present President Of B.p.s. Sikshan Sansthan Chandpura, Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Susheel Pujari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Amit Singh Shekhawat JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 09/12/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:50027] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7702/2025] 1. The present misc. petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the FIR No.210/2024 registered with Police Station Sadar Sikar, District Sikar for the offences under Sections 420, 409, 380 and 120-B IPC on the basis of compromise between the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant are in agreement that the parties have settled their dispute by entering into a compromise and now the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners. 3. This Court vide order dated 02.12.2025 directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of the compromise and the Investigating Officer was further directed to submit the verification report along with criminal antecedents of the petitioners. 4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order passed by this Court, the learned Public Prosecutor has furnished the verification report, which verifies that the parties have settled their dispute and the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners and the petitioners are not having any criminal antecedents. 5. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and looking to the fact that the dispute pertains to personal in nature and the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners and also applying the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Anr. reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and Ors. reported in 2019 (5) [2025:RJ-JP:50027] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7702/2025] SCC 688, this Court deems it just and proper to invoke inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands allowed. The impugned FIR No. FIR No.210/2024 registered with Police Station Sadar Sikar, District Sikar for the offences under Sections 420, 409, 380 and 120-B IPC stands quashed and, if any, petitioner is in custody, he be released from jail forthwith, if not required in any other case. 7. Stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 8. The factual report dated 07.12.2025 is ordered to be retained on record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/326