Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36969 (AP)

SHAIK MOHAMMED RASHEED JAMAL v. S.VEERA NARAYANA

CRP/3172/2023 · 2025-06-26

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

\ APHC010608342023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3172 OF 2023 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the Orders dated 31-08- 2023 in LA. No. 546 of 2023 in O.S No. 193 of 2017 on the file of Hon'ble i Additional District Judge, Nellore. Between: 1. Shaik Mohammed Rasheed Jamal, S/o Late Shaik Ismail, aged about 64 years, R/o D. No. 18/555, Pedda Bazar, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 2. R.Shaheen Begum alias Shaik Shaheena Begum,, W/o Shaik Mohammed Rasheed Jamal, Aged about 58 years, R/o D. No. 18/555, Pedda Bazar, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. ...PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS AND S Veera Narayana, S/o Vengaiah, Aged about 72 years, Lakshmipuram, Stonehousepeta, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. ...RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay of all further proceedings vide O.S. No. 193 of 2017 on the file of Honourable I Additional District Judge, Nellore, pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010608342023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) • I [3505] 1^- FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3172/2023 Between; ...PETITIONER(S) Shaik Mohammed Rasheed Jamal and Others AND ...RESPONDENT S Veera Narayana Counsel for the Petitioner(S); 1.HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 2. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K.TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTiiAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The I Additional District Judge, Nellore. 2. One CC to Sri. Harinath Reddy Soma Advocate [OPUC] 3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 4. Three CD Copies MKP TAC HIGH COURT DATED:27/06/2025 \ \ \ ORDER CRP NO. 3172 OF 2023 2 2 SEP 2025 ' o. ■=c. CRP IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS