IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 1151/2025 Decided on: 10.12.2025 Ajay Kumar …Petitioner Versus Anurag Chander Sharm & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Harmohan Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Following order was passed in the matter on 08.12.2025: - “The petitioner alleges violation of the directions issued in the judgment dated 29.07.2025 rendered in CWP No.2860/2024 (Ajay Kumar Vs. Executive Director (Personnel), HPSEBL & Ors.). It is admitted by learned counsel for the parties that, in Letters Patent Appeal No. 755/2025, preferred against the aforementioned judgment by the respondents, the prayer for interim relief was specifically declined on 31.10.2025. Despite grant of three previous opportunities, the judgment in question has still not been implemented in letter and spirit. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 Two days’ more time at the instance of learned counsel for the respondents is granted to enable the respondents to implement the decision in letter & spirit, failing which, the respondents shall remain present in the Court on the next date, when appropriate orders shall be passed. List on 10.12.2025.” 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the compliance affidavit is being filed during the course of the day, however, a copy whereof was made available for the perusal. In terms of the compliance affidavit, the judgment in question has been complied with. Services of the petitioner have been regularized with continuity and seniority vide office order dated 06.12.2025 and the addendum dated 08.12.2025; Consequent upon regularization of petitioner’s services, his pay was accordingly fixed under office order dated 08.12.2025; The due and admissible arrears have also been calculated and credited to petitioner’s bank account. 3. Learned proxy counsel for the petitioner on the basis of instructions imparted to him acknowledges the above position and admits due compliance of the judgment in letter & spirit. 4. Taking note of the compliance affidavit filed by the respondents, and the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the 3 respondents are discharged. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 10th December, 2025(rohit)