BRIJ MOHAN SON OF SHRI MUNSHI LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/18166/2025 · 2025-11-25
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36953 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36953 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47882] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18166/2025
1. Brij Mohan Son Of Shri Munshi Lal, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Village Bhavanpura Jagheena (Rural), District Bharatpur (Raj.), Presently Posted As Constable, Belt No. 654, At Mewar Bhil Core, Kherwara, Udaipur. 2. Dinesh Chandra Khradi Son Of Shri Rupaji, Resident Of Village Bhagela Fala, Metali, District Dungarpur (Raj.), Presently Posted As Constable, Belt No. 419, At Mewar Bhil Core, Kherwara, Udaipur. 3. Keshra Ram Son Of Shri Mala Ram, Resident Of Village Tidiyasar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.), Presently Posted As Constable, Belt No. 578, At Mewar Bhil Core, Kherwara, Udaipur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Finance (Rules), Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Secretary (Home), Ministry Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur. 4. Commandant, Mewar Bhil Core, Kherwara, Udaipur. (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:-
“i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby direct the respondents to solve the pay anomaly and fix the pay of petitioners
[2025:RJ-JP:47882] (2 of 2) [CW-18166/2025] from the date of its entitlement and pay the arrears with interest 18% p.a. thereof since the date of its entitlement in the larger interest of justice. ii) Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation.
After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /124