p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 1488 of 2025 1. Oum Prakash Sahoo 2. Gayatri Pradhan 3. Sabitri Pradhan …. Petitioners Mr. G.C. Das, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Director General of Police, Odisha, Cuttack 3. Central Bureau of Investigation, Bhubaneswar 4. Superintendent of Police, CID CB, Odisha, Cuttack 5. Superintendent of Police, Balangir 6. Inspector-in-Charge, Agalpur Police Station, Bolangir …. Opposite Parties Mr. Sarathi Jyoti Mohanty, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO Order No. ORDER 17.02.2026 04. (Through hybrid mode) CRLMP No.1488 of 2025 and I.A. No.289 of 2025 1. The CRLMP had been filed with the prayer for transfer of the case pertaining to Aglapur P.S. Case No.113 of 2025 to Opposite p. 2 Party Nos.2, 3 and 4 and to direct the said opposite parties to investigate into the matter and take action in accordance with law. 2. The IA No.289 of 2025 has been filed for correction of some typographical errors, which has been adjourned to today. Today when the matter is taken up, Mr. G.C. Das, learned counsel for the Petitioner files memo signed by Mr. Dhananjaya Mund, learned counsel for the Petitioner stating that the Petitioner wants to withdraw the CRLMP with leave to file better application. 3. Instructions dated 24.11.2025 of the IIC, Agalpur Police Station, Balangir has been received where he has stated that on 01.07.2025, Ramananda Bhoi, elder brother of the deceased- Paramananda Bhoi had lodged a written complaint alleging therein the accidental death of his brother hit by an unknown vehicle in the previous night. Basing on the information Agalpur P.S. Case No.113 dated 01.07.2025 under Section 281/106(1) of BNS has been registered and SI Suchismita Jena has been directed to investigate into the case. The Petitioner who has scribed of the FIR lodged by Ramananda Bhoi has also been examined and stated that FIR has been scribed as per the instructions of Ramananda Bhoi and has also described the steps taken during investigation of the case. p. 3 4. As the Petitioner does not want to proceed with this CRLMP, the same is permitted to be withdrawn. It is open to the Petitioner to file a fresh/better application in case there is any cause of action. 5. The CRLMP and I.A. are accordingly disposed of. (Savitri Ratho) Judge RKS