1 2025:CGHC:36418 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8547 of 2025 1 - Jitesh Sukhdeve S/o Balwant Rao Sukhdeve, Aged About 42 Years Working As Headmaster And Posted At Govt. Primary School Kharta, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 2 - Smt Megha Sukhdeve W/o Shri Jitesh Sukhdeve, Aged About 41 Years Working As Headmaster And Posted At Govt. Primary School Kharta, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Chitrarekha Sahu, W/o Shri Horilal Sahu, Aged About 41 Years Working As Headmaster And Posted At Govt. Primary School Kochway, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 4 - Danvir Sahu S/o Shri S.K. Rambharosa Sahu, Aged About 41 Years Working As Headmaster And Posted At Govt. Primary School Hatmahua, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 5 - Lokesh Kumar Dhruw S/o Shri Chamru Ram Dhruw, Aged About 42 Years Working As Headmaster And Posted At Govt. Primary School Tewari, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 6 - Arun Kumar Dhruw, S/o Shro Chaitram Dhruw, Aged About 52 Years Working As Headmaster And Posted At Govt. Primary School Rampur, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 7 - Chandrahas Sahu, S/o Shri Punarad Ram Sahu, Aged About 49 Years Working As Headmaster And Posted At Govt. Primary School Kantidadar, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 8 - Govind Ram Yadav S/o Shri Thosu Ram Yadav, Aged About 49 Years Working As Headmaster And Posted At Govt. Primary School Bhunjiyamuda, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 9 - Tihar Singh Thakur S/o Shri Harkhu Ram Thakur, Aged About 53 Years Working As Headmaster And Posted At Govt. Primary School Chhindaula-Dih, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 10 - Smt Ritu Parihar W/o Shri Surendra Singh Parihar, Aged About 50 Years ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.07.29 11:27:30 +0530 2 Working As Teacher (Lb) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Malgaon, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director, Panchayat And Social Welfare Department, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The District Education Officer, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Gariyaband, Distt. Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 28/07/2025 1. The claim of the petitioners in the present petition is with regard to grant of 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that with regard to award of the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has been issued by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of “Smt Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and others” in WA No. 261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be 3 disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to respondents/ competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in the writ petition to respondents/competent authority annexing all relevant documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law, considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case, and it is for respondents/competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 6. With this observation, the present writ petition stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok