1 2025:CGHC:36609 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3942 of 2025 Madan Gopal Dewangan S/o Ramu Ram Aged About 64 Years R/o Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner Bilaspur Division, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - The Assistant Superintendent Land Record (Nazul), Branch Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Nazul Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 6 - The District Level Committee Through- Its Chairman, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh (Constituted Under Clause 6 Of The Memorandum/ Order No. F 4-7/ Saat- 1/2019 Dated 11-09-2019 Issued By The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. For Settlement/allotment Of Encroached Government Land In Urban Areas) ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. BL Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. Rishab Bisen, PL. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 28.07.2025 2 1. This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs: “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ and set-aside the order dated 21.11.2024 (Annexure A/1) passed by the Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.), in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ and direct the respondent authorities to execute the lease deed/patta in favor of the petitioner as per earlier approvals, in the interest of justice. 10.3. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances may also be provided to the petitioner.” 2. At the outset, learned State Counsel submits that petitioner is having alternate efficacious remedy available to challenge the order dated 21.11.2024 before appropriate Forum/Authority and raised all grounds as raised before this Court. 3. In view of above, writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal/revision before the appropriate Forum/Authority and raised all grounds as raised before this Court. CC as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-