Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36945 (AP)

BUDDA VENKANNA BABU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/82/2025 · 2025-06-17

Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVA (Special Original Jurisdiction) / WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 82 OF 2025 Between: Budda Venkanna Babu, S/o. Nagaraju, Aged 56 years, Occ: Conductor (E- 458134), R/o. Door No.3-149, Sahapuram, Pedhapudi Mandal, Kakinada district-533462. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Andhra Pradesh Road Transport Corporation, Rep by its Managing Director, Bus Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Bus Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3. The District Public Traffic Manager DPTO/ Regional Manager, APSRTC, East Godavari Region Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District 4. The Depot Manager/JSO, APSRTC, Kakinada Depot, Kakinada. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declared the orders No-01/118(37)/202 4-KKD dated 08-11-2024 issued by the Respondent No.4 suspending the petitioner from service pending inquiry on charges is illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary to Rule-8 of AP Civil Services (Classification, control, and appeal) Rules 1991, and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend orders No-01/118(37)2024-KKD dated: 08-11-2024 issued by the Respondent No.4, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A SREERAM REPRESENTING SRI T D PANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR SERVICES II Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4: SRI VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following; ORDER APHC010606742024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SMB [3506] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 82/2025 Between: Budda Venkanna Babu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.TD PANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) 2.GP FOR SERVICES II 2 % The Court made the following order: V Sri A.Sreeram, learned counsel, representing Sri T.D.Phani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. i Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ^ECTIC^^FFICER To 1. One CC to Sri T D Pani Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Services II, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Kumar Tarlada (SC for APSRTC), Advocate [wi UOJ 4. Three CD Copies TF I w-~ HIGH COURT DATED: 18/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.82 of 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS