SMT. VANDANA KAUSHIK WIFE OF MUKESH KUMAR KAUSHIK v. SHRI PAWAN KUMAR GOYAL
CCP/953/2022 · 2025-11-11
Mahendar Kumar Goyal, Praveer Bhatnagar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36940 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36940 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45230-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 953/2022 In DB Special Appeal (Writ) No. 663/2015 Smt. Vandana Kaushik Wife Of Mukesh Kumar Kaushik, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Mukharji Nagar, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Shri Pawan Kumar Goyal, Additional Chief Secretary, Education, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Shri Gaurav Agrawal, Director Of Education, (Primary And Secondary), Bikaner, Rajasthan.
3. Shri Prem Singh Kuntal, District Education Officer, Secondary, Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
4. Shri R.d. Bansal, District Education Officer, Primary, Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
5. Shri Rakesh Singh, Director, Aadhar Shikshan Sanstha, Neemda Gate, Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
6. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary Education Department Secretariat Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.P. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with Mr. Chinmay Saxena HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 11/11/2025 This civil contempt petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by the learned counsels for the respective parties:-
[2025:RJ-JP:45230-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-953/2022]
1. In view of Division Bench judgment dated 21.08.2025, passed by this Court in D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.1666/2018: Dr. Anil Kumar Mathur & Ors. versus Mr. Ashutosh A.T. Pdednekar & Ors. and other connected matters, this civil contempt petition is dismissed.
2. However, rights and liabilities of the parties in the subject-matter of dispute shall remain subject to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Special Leave to Petition preferred against the aforesaid judgment. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Keshav/70