Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36937 (CHH)

ISHWARI LAL SONI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3299/2019 · 2025-03-04

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:10498 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3299 of 2019 Ishwari Lal Soni, S/o Late Manrakhan Lal Soni, Aged About 77 Years, Retired Head Master, R/o Bramha Chowk, Near Gokulpur School, Mahatma Gandhi Ward, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1- State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Urban Administration and Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Atal Nagar, Post office Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2- Director, Urban Administration and Development Department, State of Chhattisgarh Indravati Bhawan, Mantralay, Atal Nagar, Post office Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3- Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Itwari Bazar, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgah. 4 - Bhawan Adhikari, Municipal Corporation Itwari Bazar, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. 5 – Collector, Dhamtari, Rudri Road, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. 6 - Tahsildar, Dhamtari Tahsil office Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. R. L. Rajak, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Atul Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate For State : Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Panel Lawyer Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- For Respondents No. 3 & 4 : Ms. Swati Agrawal, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 04.03.2025 1) Heard on admission. 2) With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally. 3) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1. To direct the concerned respondent authorities to act upon the letters filed as Annexure P-6 and thereafter to proceed as per law, in the interest of justice. 10.2. To grant such other relief(s) as this Hon’ble Court deems fit, in the interest of justice.” 4) Mr. Rajak would submit that the order was passed by the Deputy Collector, Dhamtari on 10.04.2019 directing the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Dhamtari to lodged FIR against the persons who fabricated the revenue documents. He would further submit that though order was passed on 10.04.2019, but till date no action has been taken against those persons. 5) Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Rajak, at this juncture, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)/Deputy Collector, Dhamtari to take appropriate action pursuant to letter dated 10.04.2019, expeditiously. 6) With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is hereby disposed of at the admission stage itself. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge NADIM