BAJLUR RAHAMAN MONDAL v. BANGIYA GRAMIN VIKASH BANK AND ANR.
WPA/20134/2021 · 2025-04-30
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36932 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36932 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
30.04.2025 4 Ct.No.7 sdas
WPA 20134 of 2021
Bajlur Rahaman Mondal Vs. Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank & Anr.
Mr. Baidurya Ghosal Ms. Anupama Biswas Mr. Sourav Mukherjee …. for the respondents
Mr. Ghosal, learned advocate representing the respondent bank submits that with the passage of time the writ petition has become infructuous. Heard Mr. Ghosal and perused the materials on record. As with the passage of time the writ petition has become infructuous, the same is dismissed as infructuous.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)