HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12242 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. Counter affidavit filed by learned A.G.A. is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant Manoj Chaurasiya Alias Kamlesh Alias Gavsul Azam with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.03 of 2025, under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2), 204 and 205 B.N.S., Police Station Cyber Crime Maharajganj, District Maharajganj, during pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. He further submitted that the applicant is not real beneficiary of so called transfer. In the F.I.R. three persons namely Manoj Chaurasiya alias Kamlesh alias Gosul Azam, Santosh and Satish Tripathi have been named. Two co-accused persons Santosh and Satish Tripathi have already been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 13.05.2025 and 23.07.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.15996 of 2025 and 7032 of 2025 respectively. It is further submitted that the informant is himself real beneficiary. Learned counsel for the applicant has drawn attention of the Court towards the statement of Fatima Khatun. He submitted that Fatima Khatun is member of the informant and other accused persons are real beneficiary. Learned Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Sharma, Arun Kumar Tripathi, Rajnish Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manoj Chaurasiya Alias Kamlesh Alias Gavsul Azam .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) A.G.A. has not specifically stated that role/involvement regarding beneficiary of so called transaction of the applicant in this case. No particulars regarding specific amount received or misappropriated by the accused-applicant have been shown by the learned A.G.A. The applicant is languishing in jail since 01.02.2025. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that applicant is the real beneficiary. He further contended that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant; keeping in view uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, bail application is allowed. 7. Considering the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Manish Sisodia Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 LawSuit (SC) 677, considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :- (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses. (ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date BAIL No. 12242 of 2025 2 fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A I.P.C./269 B.N.S. (iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C./84 B.N.S.S. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A I.P.C./209. B.N.S. (v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C./351 B.N.S.S. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 7, 2025 Asha BAIL No. 12242 of 2025 3 (Santosh Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad