Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36918 (AP)

Patnana Suresh, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/1346/2025 · 2025-01-21

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010606612024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 1346/2025 Between: 1. PATNANA SURESH,, S/O. APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 2-88/1, YELLAPUVANIPALEM VILLAGE, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNANN-530027 DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, VIZIANAGARAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHIPURUPALLI REVENUE DIVISION, CHIPURUPALLI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, MERAKAMUDIDAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P. 5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, MERAKAMUDIDAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P. 6. PATNANA APPANNA, S/O. SOLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O. DABA STREET, MERAKAMUDIDAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P. C/O K.RADHA,R/O. SK.TOWERS,ADITHYA COLLEGE BACKSIDE GOPALAPATANAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATANAM DISTRICT, A.P.- 530027 7. PATNANA RAMU, S/O. POLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. LALITHA RESIDENCY IN SHANTHI NAGAR, NAD,VISAKHAPATNAM- 2 530009, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D S V KRISHNAJEE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri D.S.V. Krishnaji, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to approach the Civil Court. 2. Request granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Writ Petitioner to approach the Civil Court. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 21.01.2025 Vns