IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 1018/2025 Decided on: 03.12.2025 Sanjana Kumari & Ors. …Petitioners. Versus Ashish Kohli .…Respondent .……………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Learned Assistant Advocate General has placed on record an office instruction dated 10.11.2025 from the Director School Education conveying that the cases of the petitioners have been considered under office order dated 10.09.2025. Copy of the said order has also been appended along with office instructions. 2. Learned Assistant Advocate General submits that in terms of the aforesaid order, the judgment in question has been complied with. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the above position, however, submits that liberty be reserved to the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? petitioners to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the redressal of their surviving grievances. 4. In view of above, this contempt petition is accordingly closed with liberty as prayed for. Notice issued to the respondent is discharged. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 03rd December, 2025(rohit)