Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36915 (RAJ)

MOHAMMAD JAMEEL S/O SHRI ANWAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14880/2025 · 2025-11-17

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46196] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14880/2025 1. Mohammad Jameel S/o Shri Anwar, R/o Ward No. 16, Mandawa, Police Station Mandawa, District Jhunjhunu. (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu) 2. Adreesh S/o Shri Sattar, R/o Ward No. 16, Mandawa, Police Station Mandawa, District Jhunjhunu. (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Intjar Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 17/11/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.6/2025 registered at Police Station Mandawa, District-Jhunjhunu for offences under Sections 79, 109(1), 115(2), 189(2), 190, 333, 351(3) and 352 of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that no specific act has been attributed to the accused- petitioners. The injury in question was caused by co-accused- Anish. Other co-accused-Mohammad Sataar, Anwar Ali, Abdul Majeed, Amir, Mohammad Juber, Kapil Kumar @ Deva and Abdul [2025:RJ-JP:46196] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14880/2025] have been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court and this Court. Petitioner are behind the bars since 15.10.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Mohammad Jameel S/o Shri Anwar and Adreesh S/o Shri Sattar shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/4