APHC010605322024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9808 Between: Devavarapu Venkateswara Rao The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. RAM BABU DEVAVARAPU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER:- The Criminal Petition, under Section 48 Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [ petitioner/accused seeking Payakaraopeta Police Station, 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section ‘BNS). IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9808 OF 2024 Devavarapu Venkateswara Rao ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: RAM BABU DEVAVARAPU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Court made the following: The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [for short, ‘B.N.S.S’], is filed on behalf of the petitioner/accused seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.424 Police Station, Anakapalli District. A case has been registered against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha (for short IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3327] THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT of the Bharatiya Nagarik is filed on behalf of the 424 of 2024 of A case has been registered against the petitioner for the offence Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha (for short 3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that after death of father of defacto complainant, a partition was effected between the brothers in respect of land, inherited from their ancestors. His brother has been holding a grudge and trying to occupy the share of the defacto complainant in Sy.No.197/1. While the defacto complainant was ploughing the land, the accused came with a knife, using filthy language and obstructed the tractor and attacked him with the knife on his left shoulder, on left armpit and caused bleeding injuries. The accused attempted to kill him by slashing with the knife, but the tractor driver came there and rescued him from the accused. Hence, a case has been registered, basing on the report of the defacto complainant. 4. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that investigation is not yet completed in the case and granting of anticipatory bail to the petitioner would hamper the investigation. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. _____________________________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Date: 09.01.2025 KK