1 2025:CGHC:37186 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8733 of 2025 1 - Surendra Singh Parihar S/o Indrajeet Singh Parihar Aged About 60 Years Working As Lecturer (LB) And Posted At Govt Higher Secondary School Nagabuda Block Gariyaband,district- Gariyaband (C.G.) 2 - Chain Singh Yadav S/o Shri Deo Singh Yadav Aged About 56 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Khattia Block- Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 3 - Horilal Sahu S/o Shri Paras Ram Sahu Aged About 49 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Pandripani Block Gariyaband,district- Gariyaband (C.G.) 4 - Nitin H. Vakharia S/o Shri Harkishan Das Vakharia Aged About 51 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Marauda Block Gariyaband,district- Gariyaband (C.G.) 5 - Devendar Kumar Paney S/o Shri Brijwasi Pandey Aged About 51 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Jaitpuri Block Gariyaband,district- Gariyaband (C.G.) 6 - Nokhe Lal Sahu S/o Shri Goverdhan Lal Sahu Aged About 50 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Barbahra Block Gariyaband,district- Gariyaband (C.G.) 7 - Ramkhilawan Dhruw S/o Shri Narottam Dhruw Aged About 52 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Amdi (D) Block Gariyaband,district- Gariyaband (C.G.) Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 8 - Fagesh Singh Kanwar S/o Shri Jahalu Ram Kanwar Aged About 51 Years Working Asteacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Dewari Block Chhura,district- Gariyaband (C.G.) 9 - Sanjiv Sahu S/o Shri Ratan Lal Sahu Aged About 58 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Amethi Block -Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) 10 - Tarun Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Banshi Lal Sahu Aged About 48 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Aamjhar Block Gariyaband,district- Gariyaband (C.G.) 11 - Narsingh Nagesh S/o Shri Sadaram Nagesh Aged About 50 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Lohari, Block Gariaband District - Gariaband (C.G.) 12 - Bhagwant Kutare S/o Shri Manik Rao Kutare Aged About 50 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Tanwarbahra , Block Gariaband District - Gariaband (C.G.) 13 - Sanjiv Kumar Sonteke S/o Shri Purushottam Lal Sonteke Aged About 52 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Amdi (D) Block Gariaband District - Gariaband (C.G.) 14 - Jeevendra Kumar Dhruw S/o Shri Shankar Singh Dhruw Aged About 45 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Birodar Block Chhura District - Gariaband (C.G.) 15 - Pradeep Kumar Sonwari S/o Shri Kavinath Sonwani Aged About 51 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Gujra , Block Gariaband District - Gariaband (C.G.) 16 - Chhagan Lal Puchbhiye S/o Shri Samaru Ram Puchbhiye Aged About 54 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Jadiada Block Gariaband District - Gariaband (C.G.) 17 - Chandu Lal Sinha S/o Shri Narottam Sinha Aged About 60 Years Working As Teacher (LB) And Posted At Govt Middle School Kosmi (B) Block Gariaband District - Gariaband (C.G.) 3 18 - Mohamed Javed Khan S/o Shri M.A. Khan Aged About 57 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Govt Higher Secondary School Nagabuda , Block Gariaband District - Gariaband (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya New Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Panchayat And Social Welfare Department Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The District Education Officer Gariyaband District- Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Gariyaband Distt- Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 30-07-2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are seeking direction towards the respondent authorities for grant of Krmonnati Vetanman on completion of 10 years of service in view of the order dated 28-02-2024 passed by the Division Bench of this High Court in WA No. 261/2023 and also as per circular dated 10-03-2017 issued by the State Government of C.G. 2. The claim of the petitioners is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023, has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make their 4 representation to the competent authority in light of order dated 28/02/2024 passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents. 5. Against the order passed in WA No.261 of 2023, the State preferred a review petition bearing REVP No. 147 of 2024, which was considered and rejected by a detailed order. There against the State filed an SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court bearing SLP(C) No. 58525 of 2024, which was dismissed by order dated 17-03-2025. 6. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make their representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No. 261 of 2023. On such representation(s) being made, it is expected that the competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 4 months from the date of receipt of such representation(s). It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil