Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36908 (CHH)

PANKAJ SAHU v. RETURNING OFFICER

CR/155/2024 · 2025-03-18

Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:12741 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CR No. 155 of 2024 • Pankaj Sahu S/o Late Shri Phoolchand Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Subhash Nagar, Ward No. 25, Mahasamund Police Station Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus 1. Returning Officer Local Election Municipal Council, Mahasamund, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 2. Pawan Patel S/o Late Shri Ramesar Patel Aged About 52 Years R/o Subhash Nagar, Ward No. 32, Mahasamund Police Station, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 3. Dhanesh Tandi S/o Late Shri Rajpuliya Aged About 30 Years R/o Mandi, Ward No. 24, Mahasamund, Police Station, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 4. Lakhanlal Chandrakar S/o Late Shri Agnu Aged About 42 Years R/o Mandi Road, Ward No. 24, Mahasamund, Police Station, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh PRIYANKA VERMA Digitally signed by PRIYANKA VERMA Date: 2025.03.18 18:03:37 +0530 2 5. Dilip Yadav S/o Late Lingraj Aged About 30 Years R/o Khalhepara, Ward No. 24, Mahasamund, Police Station, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 6. Bhipendra (Vipin) Sharma S/o Late Shri Sanat Sharma Aged About 40 Years R/o Kumhar Para, Ward No. 24, Mahasamund, Police Station, Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 7. Jeevan Chandrakar S/o Late Shri Jagguram Chandrakar Aged About 37 Years R/o Mandi Road, Ward No. 24, Mahasamund, Police Station Tahsil And District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 8. Collector Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate For State : Mr. S.K. Puria, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board 18/03/2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that a new body of Municipal Council has been constituted, therefore, by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the Revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Priyanka