IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (203) RSA-502-2000 Date of decision: - 26.05.2025 Ved Parkash ....Appellant Versus The State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Ms. Anusha Jain, Advocate for Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that in spite of her best efforts, she has not been able to get in touch with the appellant and even no one has approached her office so as to state as to whether any cause survives in the present appeal or not. It is prayed that the present appeal be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous but liberty be granted to the appellant to revive the appeal in case any cause survives. 2. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 3. Liberty is granted to the appellant to move an application for restoration of the appeal in case any cause survives. 4. Registry is directed to send the copy of the present order to the parties on the addresses mentioned in the memo of parties. ( VIKAS BAHL ) May 26, 2025 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.05.27 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement