Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36906 (KAR)

SMT. UMA K BHASKAR v. SRI SIDDARTHA EDUCATION SOCIETY

WA/1873/2024 · 2025-01-24

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3134-DB WA No. 1873 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT APPEAL NO. 1873 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. UMA K BHASKAR W/O LATE K BHASHKARA ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 2. SRI BHARATH KUNJAL S/O LATE K BHASKARA ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 3. SRI BHAVYA K D/O LATE K BHASKARA ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 4. SRI BHAVANA K D/O LATE K BHASKARA ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT "KRISHNA", 10TH CROSS, SOMESHWARAPURAM, TUMKURU - 572 101 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. S RAJESH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MUKKANNAPPA S B, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3134-DB WA No. 1873 of 2024 AND: 1. SRI. SIDDARTHA EDUCATION SOCIETY GOLLAHALLI POST, MARALUR, TUMKUR - 572 105 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. SRI SIDDARTHA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, MARALUR, TUMKUR-572105 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 19.02.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WRIT APPEAL NO.41464 OF 2017 AND CONSEQUENTLY CONFIRM THE ORDER DATED 19.07.2017 PASSED IN EX.P.NO.7/2016 FILED BY THE 1ST APPELLANT'S HUSBAND BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT TUMKUR BY DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3134-DB WA No. 1873 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Learned advocate Mr. S. Rajesh for learned advocate Mr. S.B. Mukkannappa for the appellants files a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal, which is taken on record. 2. Permission is granted. 3. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, however, without going into the merits of the case. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23