Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36902 (CHH)

STATE OF CHHATTISGARH v. SHYAM SUNDER SHUKLA

MCC/811/2025 · 2025-08-07

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:39895 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 811 of 2025 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Forest, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Divisional Forest Officer Forest Division Rajnandgaon District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Divisional Forest Officer Forest Division Khairagarh District- Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Conservator Of Forest And Incharge Forest Divisional Officer Durg Forest Division Durg, District- Durg,chhattisgarh. ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - Shyam Sunder Shukla S/o Late Jhumuk Lal Shukla Aged About 55 Years R/o Jail Road, Near Forest Barrier, Ward No. 21, Dongargarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s)/State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, G.A.. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 08/08/2025 Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 1. By way of this MCC, the applicant has prayed for following prayer:- “In the circumstances, it is most humbly prayed that Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant / extend further six months time for compliance of the order dated 12/02/2025 passed by the Hon'ble Court in W.P. (S) No. 5629/2024 to the applicants, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that vide earlier order dated 12.02.2025, the respondents were directed to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization in service in accordance with law expeditiously. He further submits that since they could not decide the case of the petitioner for regularization in service within the said stipulated period as such they have filed this application for extension of time. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the grounds raised in the application, the applicant/State is granted 3 months more time to decide the case of the petitioner for regularization in service. 4. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat