Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36900 (RAJ)

KASHIF ZAKI SON OF NASIR IQBAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19239/2024 · 2025-11-03

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44027] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19239/2024 Kashif Zaki Son Of Nasir Iqbal, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Masjid Ke Pass, Nayapura, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare (Sihfw), Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur, Through Its Director. 4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Kota. 5. Principal And Controller, Govt. Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh with Mr. Jitesh Kumawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayers: “i) the respondents may be directed to include the name of the petitioner in the final merit list in his category OBC-NCL and petitioner may be given appointment on the post of Nursing Officer pursuant to advertisement (Annexure-1) with all consequential benefits; ii) Any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is having three certificates of experience and by order dated [2025:RJ-JP:44027] (2 of 2) [CW-19239/2024] 29.08.2023 issued by Superintendent and Member Secretary, RMRS, MDS Hospital, Kota, the days were modified from 467 to 542 but the respondent(s) have considered 467 days to grant him bonus if 542 days are considered, then the petitioner is entitled for 30 bonus marks. 3. Learned counsel for respondent(s) suggests that the petitioner may submit a representation to the respondent(s) on the basis of said analogy and Department will consider and will act accordingly, and on examination, if found that petitioner has secured more marks than last cut-off than he would be afforded appointment by the Department. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 6 weeks raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /88