DAPOLI EDUCATION SOC. DAPOLI THR. PRESIDENT AND ORS v. THE STATE OF MAHA. THR. SEC. SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPT. AND ORS
WP/1694/2025 · 2025-02-14
Shri Ashwin D Bhobe, Shri Ravindra V Ghuge
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36897 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36897 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
908.WP1694.2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1694 OF 2025 Dapoli Education Soc. Dapoli & Ors. … Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents. **** Mr.Prashant Bhavake, for the Petitioner. Ms. P.N. Diwan, AGP for Respondent/State. **** CORAM :
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
DATE :
14th FEBRUARY, 2025 P.C. :
1. We have perused the impugned order dated 12.10.2022. We do not agree with the submissions of the Petitioners that the said order amounts to rejection of the proposal. In fact, the said order can not be impugned. The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Ratnagiri has only pointed out the deficiencies and has actually called upon the Management to remove the deficiencies and tender a proper proposal. Certain objections are also raised in the said order .
2. In view of above, this Petition is disposed off. Let the Management, who is a Petitioner before us, prepare a revised proposal in the light of the G.R. dated 6.2.2012, which prescribes a check list of Talwalkar 1
ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Digitally signed by ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Date: 2025.02.25 11:05:33 +0530
908.WP1694.2025.odt documents to be appended to the proposal, within 30 days from today.
3. The Management tenders its email address for easy correspondence as under : desdapoli@gmail.com and aghighschool@rediffmail.com
4. If the concerned authority desires further information to be tendered by the Management, he would enter into correspondence with the Management on the above stated email. The Management shall cooperate. If required, the Management is at liberty to tender its written notes along with case law, on which reliance is placed, for the assistance of the Education Officer.
5. Let the above exercise be completed within a period of 60 days. If the proposal is rejected, the said order shall be supported with reasons.
6. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the proposal. Only to avoid further litigation, we are observing that if the proposal is accepted, further steps for processing the papers for grant of Shalarth I.D./bills of the employees, would be undertaken.
[ (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Talwalkar 2