RSA-2155- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 202 Gurmel Singh Jarnail Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. judgment and decree dated District Judge plaintiff/respondent decree dated Judge, Sunam 2. 3. following order was passed by 4. as the respondents Sole Appellant Respondents No. 1 and 2 Respondent -1999 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Gurmel Singh Versus Jarnail Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Appellant/defendant No. 2 is judgment and decree dated 31.10.1998, passed by the learned District Judge, Sangrur, vide which respondent No. 1 herein was allowed reversing the judgment and decree dated 27.10.1994 passed by the learned Judge, Sunam. The matter pertains to the year 1999. On 24.05.2024, when this case was listed for hearing, following order was passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court “Learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite reminder being sent to the appellant, he has not received any response from the appellant an notice be issued to the appellant. Let notice to the appellant be issued for 15.10.2024. Notice to sole respondent be also issued for the date fixed.” Pursuant thereto, notices were issued to the appellant as the respondents and service report dated Sole Appellant Died. Respondents No. 1 and 2 Died. Respondent No. 3 He was to be served through mother (as per original MOP). She is died. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2155-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA /defendant No. 2 is in second appeal against the , passed by the learned Additional the appeal filed by the was allowed reversing the judgment and passed by the learned Addition Senior Sub The matter pertains to the year 1999. , when this case was listed for hearing, ordinate Bench of this Court:- Learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite reminder being sent to the appellant, he has not received any response from the appellant and requests that notice be issued to the appellant. Let notice to the appellant be issued for 15.10.2024. Notice to sole respondent be also issued for the date Pursuant thereto, notices were issued to the appellant as well report dated 14.10.2024, reads as under:- He was to be served through mother (as per original MOP). She is died. in second appeal against the Additional was allowed reversing the judgment and Addition Senior Sub , when this case was listed for hearing, Learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite reminder being sent to the appellant, he has not d requests that Notice to sole respondent be also issued for the date as well He was to be served through mother (as per RISHU KATARIA 2025.07.15 19:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-2155- 5. an adjournment has been circulated by learned counsel for the respondent. Today again, learned counsel for the respondent(s) on the grou (Canada) to attend a marriage on 13.07.2025. 6. the appellant pendency of the present second appeal before more than 2 pursuing the same, as no attempt has been made by LRs to contact 7. instant regular second appeal is liberty to application within a period of 0 same, if so, advised. 8. 14.07.2025 rishu -1999 (O&M) -2- On the last date of hearing 20.03.2025, a written request for an adjournment has been circulated by learned counsel for the respondent. Today again, another request for an adjournment has been circulated by learned counsel for the respondent(s) on the grou (Canada) to attend a marriage on 13.07.2025. In view of the aforesaid premise, the appellant would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long pendency of the present second appeal before 25 years, the appellant or his LR(s), if any, have pursuing the same, as no attempt has been made by to contact his counsel or to engage a new counsel. Be that as it may, in view of the foregoing circumstances, the instant regular second appeal is dismissed for non liberty to the appellants or their LRs, if any application within a period of 03 months from today f same, if so, advised. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable On the last date of hearing 20.03.2025, a written request for an adjournment has been circulated by learned counsel for the respondent. another request for an adjournment has been circulated by learned counsel for the respondent(s) on the ground that he is in abroad (Canada) to attend a marriage on 13.07.2025. aforesaid premise, issuance of fresh notice to would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long pendency of the present second appeal before this Court for a period of the appellant or his LR(s), if any, have lost interest in pursuing the same, as no attempt has been made by the appellant or his counsel or to engage a new counsel. Be that as it may, in view of the foregoing circumstances, the dismissed for non-prosecution, with , if any, to move an appropriate months from today for reviving the Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No On the last date of hearing 20.03.2025, a written request for an adjournment has been circulated by learned counsel for the respondent. another request for an adjournment has been circulated by nd that he is in abroad issuance of fresh notice to would be a futile exercise. It appears that due to sheer long this Court for a period of lost interest in the appellant or his Be that as it may, in view of the foregoing circumstances, the with to move an appropriate or reviving the RISHU KATARIA 2025.07.15 19:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.