2025:HHC:43039-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 1362/2018 & CMP No. 29682/2025 Decided on: 11.12.2025 Greenlam Industries Limited …..Petitioner Versus Union of India & ors. ….Respondents ______________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Goverdhan Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.G. for respondents No. 2 & 3-State. Mr. Vijay K. Arora, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Godawari, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (oral) During the pendency of the present petition, the petitioner has preferred an application, CMP No. 29682/2025, for withdrawal of the main writ petition with liberty to approach the Court again in case grievance of the petitioner is not redressed in the representation proposed to be made to the 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 respondents in terms of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Hero Motocorp Ltd. v. Union of India, 2023 (1) SCC 386. 2 No objection has been communicated for allowing the aforesaid prayer. 3 Accordingly, the writ petition along with pending application(s) is permitted to be withdrawn to enable the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority by making representation before the GST Council and the State of H.P. with liberty to approach the Court again in case any grievance still survives to be redressed. 4 The petition is disposed of, as withdrawn, in the aforesaid terms, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Romesh Verma) 11.12.2025 Judge (pankaj)