Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36888 (AP)

D NAGARAJU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/81/2025 · 2025-01-06

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010606212024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 81/2025 Between: 1. D NAGARAJU, , S/O VENKATA RATNAM, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC JUNIOR LINE MAN GR-LL (ID NO.80002525), R/O.DR.NO.11- 21-18, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, KAVALI MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. ANDHRA PRADESH SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRINIVASAPURAM, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATIONS, NELLORE. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATION DIVISION KAVALI, NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATION SUB-DIVISION, KAVALI. 6. DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATION DIVISION, KALIGIRI. 7. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, OPERATION, JALADANKI (KALIGIRI SUB-DIVISION),KAVALI, NELLORE. 2 8. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, OPERATION, KAVALI RURALS, KAVALI, NELLORE ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not taking the Petitioner back to duty by issuing appropriate orders allocating work at the place of Posting as per General Transfers issued vide Memo Dt.22.09.2024 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents allow the Petitioner to duty by allocating work and to pay salary from the date of Reporting to duty i.e., 01.08.2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 21.11.2024 by allowing to duty and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAVIKANTH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER Sri P.Ravikanth, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file fresh writ petition. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 06.01.2025 SNI 4 44 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.81 OF 2025 Dated: 06.01.2025 SNI