Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 36886 (AP)

Yadam Laxmi , v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department,

WP/28918/2018 · 2025-07-15

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010605532018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 28918/2018 Between: YADAM LAXMI, W/O. LATE YADAM TRINADHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YRS, R/O SWETHCAVATHI NAGAR, MAIN ROAD, ICHAPURAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT GUNTUR 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ICHAPURAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. P CHIRANJEEVI, S/O NOT KNOWN, OCC- CONSTABLE TOWN POLICE STATION, ICHAPURAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. RAMA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, OCC- CONSTABLE/WRITER, TOWN POLICE STATION, ICHAPURAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No.3 in not taking appropriate action against the erring constables as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents No.3 to 5 to enquire into the matter and to take appropriate action against the erring constables.” 2. None represented for the Petitioner. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home brought to the notice of the Court that the Sub-Divisional Police Officer has enquired into the matter and found that there is no truth in the allegations leveled by the Petitioner against the erring constables. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.07.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.28918 of 2018 Dt.16.07.2025 Dinesh