SUBHANI ALIAS KHUDO MIYAN ALIAS MD SUBHANI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6385/2025 · 2025-11-12
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36879 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 36879 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:33848 1 A.B.A. No. 6385 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 6385 of 2025
---- 1.Subhani @ Khudo Miyan @ Md. Subhani aged about 44 years son of Sobarati Miyan 2.Rahamuddin Miyan @ Rahamuddin Ansari @ Rahman Ansari, aged about 44 years son of Sobarati Miyan 3.Alim Miyan @ Alimuddin Ansari aged about 43 years son of Sobarati Ansari 4.Siraj Ansari @ Md. Siraj Ansari aged about 44 years son of Md. Faruk Ansari 5.Abdula Ansari @ Abdulah, aged about 29 years son of Md. Faruk Ansari 6.Saddam Ansari @ Md. Saddam Ansari, aged about 27 years son of Wahid Ansari 7.Afatab Aalam @ Altaf Ansari, aged about 19 years son of Wahid Ansari 8.Sahabaj Ansari aged about 24 years son of Subhani Ansari 9.Araman Ansari @ Arbaj Ansari aged about 22 years son of Subhani Ansari 10.Faruk Miyan @ Md. Faruk Ansari, aged about 54 years son of Sobarati Miyan, All are resident of Village Nawadih, PO Manigarhi, PS Sarawan District-Deoghar, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioners
:- Mr. Arvind Kr Choudhary, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Advocate
---- 2/12.11.2025 Heard learned counsels for petitioners and for State.
2.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sarawan P.S. Case No.07 of 2025, for offence registered under section 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 351(2), 352, 118(2) and 109 of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Deoghar.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that there are case and counter case between the parties and both the sides have lodged the case and he also submits that both the sides have received injury. He then submits that the petitioners’ side have receive grievous injury and they were
2025:JHHC:33848 2 A.B.A. No. 6385 of 2025
referred for treatment at Ranchi. He then submits that altercation took place due to land dispute.
4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that allegations of assault are there.
5. Considering that there are case and counter case between the parties and the petitioners’ side have received grievous injury and the altercation took place due to land dispute, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners.
6. Accordingly, petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of their surrender/arrest, petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Deoghar, in connection with Sarawan P.S. Case No.07 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 12.11.2025 SI/