1 2025:CGHC:47665-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 683 of 2025 1 - Indian Institute Of Management Raipur Through Chief Executive Officer, Po Kuru, Tehsil- Abhanpur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Dr. Ram Kalani Director, IIM Raipur, Office Address At IIM Raipur, Tehsil - Abhanpur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Dr. Parikshit Charan S/o Mool Singh Charan Aged About 49 Years R/o Flat No. 5, Block 1, Faculty R/o IIM Raipur Campus, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh (Petitioner) 2 - Board Of Governor Through The Chairman Shri Puneet Dalmia, Dalmia Bharat Limited, R/o 11 And 12 Floor, Hansalaya Building, 15 Barakhamba Road, New Delhi 110001 3 - Department Of Personnel And Training Through The Secretary Government Of India, Ministry Of Personnel, Public Grievance And Pensions, Room No. 222d, North Block, New Delhi (Respondent No. 3) 4 - Shri P.R. Devi Prasad Enquiry Officer C/o Director Indian Institute Of Management, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Appellants : Dr. Shiv Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sudeep Johri, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Ms. Anmol Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri R avindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.09.18 12:23:52 +0530 2 Per Ram esh Sinha, C.J. 17/09/2025 1. Heard Dr. Shiv Kumar Shrivastava, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Sudeep Johri, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 and Ms. Anmol Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3. 2. Heard on I.A. No. 2 of 2025, which is an application for kind leave of the Hon’ble Court to withdraw instant writ appeal. 3. On due consideration and for the reason mentioned in the application that the dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties, the matter, as of now, become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the I.A. No.2 of 2025 is allowed and the writ appellants are permitted to withdraw the present appeal. 5. Consequently, the present writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice ved